đȘđž This Week in Spain: SĂĄnchez's Investiture Day
Also: 'SĂĄlvame' is back (kind of) and... is Taylor Swift buying property in Mallorca?
By @IanMount and @AdrianBono | November 16, 2023 | Madrid | Issue #37
đ Welcome to The Tapa, an English-language, weekly newsletter about all things Spain!
đ„ This Week in a Nutshell: The big day is finally here. After months of comings and goings, a summer election, palace intrigue, complicated maths and failed investitures, it looks like, in the end, Pedro SĂĄnchez managed to get exactly what he wanted. If all goes according to plan, the caretaker prime minister is on course to secure a new term in a parliamentary vote today.
đ Remember that if this email gets truncated at the bottom because itâs too long, just click here to read the rest on Substack.
đ But wait, thereâs more! The Tapa has its very own LinkedIn page to grow a new community. Please check it out and, if youâre so inclined, follow us here.
đșIf you havenât subscribed yet, please do so by clicking on the button below.
đ«¶ And if you already have, please send this newsletter around to your friends and family and help us keep growing.
Four more years
Pedro SĂĄnchez on Course to be Voted Prime Minister
The Big Day. High Noon. The moment weâve all been waiting for. Take whichever cliche you prefer, thatâs what Wednesday was.Â
At least for Pedro SĂĄnchez, Spainâs caretaker PSOE socialist Prime Minister who had cleared the way to repeat in the countryâs top job.Â
And for Catalan separatists with legal problems, whoâd negotiated a deal to get amnesty if SĂĄnchez got his wish.Â
And for the right-wingers of Hazte OĂr driving around Madrid in a bus plastered with an image of SĂĄnchez as Hitler (Nazis were national socialists and SĂĄnchez is a socialist soâŠget it?) and his partyâs initials written as Pedro SĂĄnchez Odia España. If it must be said, Hazte OĂr do not like SĂĄnchez or want him in power.
SĂĄnchezâs Big Dayâor, rather, the two-day investiture process that will previsiblemente culminate on Thursday in a (close to 100% likely) âyesâ vote for a new SĂĄnchez termâin fact began yesterday at high noon in Parliament, with the speaker Francina Armengol reading the Kingâs proposal of SĂĄnchez as a candidate. And then SĂĄnchez stepped up to the dais to give his Big Speech.
The speech is, in theory, a chance for the candidate to explain his or her program (though in Spain always his to date) and why the MPs should vote for him.
SĂĄnchez did explain some measures his government would put in place in a new term, but really that was the least awaited part of his speech and caused few sparks.
SĂĄnchez said his new government would: a) provide free public transport for minors, young people, and the unemployed; b) maintain reduced IVA on basic foods for six more months; c) raise the income ceiling for people to apply for help paying their mortgages to âŹ38,000; d) remove statutes of limitation on child sexual abuses and create a fund for those abused by the church; e) create a national mental health pact to train more psych professionals and expand treatment; and f) plenty of other smaller and/or less defined changes like creating âcultural rightsâ, which seems like basically more art everywhere, and blah blah.
It was all pretty palatable for people across the political spectrumâwho doesnât like free stuff and more art?âand complaints were largely limited to casposo grumblings that SĂĄnchez doesnât have the power to do some of the things and others had already been announced, and it was expensive, and blah blah.
Amnesty! SĂĄnchez took almost an hour and a half to get to the main course, the dish everyone was waiting for (drumroll, please)⊠the, um, controversial deal his party made with Carles Puigdemontâthe former Catalan regional boss who oversaw the illegal independence referendum in 2017 and then self-exiled to a McMansion in the Brussels suburbsâto get the seven votes from Junts, Puigdemontâs party, that SĂĄnchez needs fort re-election.Â
And SĂĄnchez being the risk-loving pol he is, he did not shy away.Â
Knowing full well that amnesty for Catalan separatists in itself has little support, SĂĄnchez went for the best defenseâthat is, a good offense. He went on the attack.
So instead of defending amnesty as a good policy per se, SĂĄnchez framed his agreeing to it as a necessary price to pay to keep right wing nutters like Voxâwho would come in on the PPâs coattailsâout of power.
âThe circumstances are what they are,â SĂĄnchez said, and one had to "make a virtue out of necessity." Plus, considering that, you know, the whole 1O separatist referendum madness happened while the PP was in power (in the body of PM Mariano Rajoy), the PSOE couldnât exactly do worse: âThe PP recipe led to disaster in Catalonia. We are committed to dialogue and forgiveness."
In other words, we had to do this unpleasant thing to avoid a government formed by the PP and the radical right. Which is basically the same argument SĂĄnchez used to get just enough votes on 23J to stop the PPâpropped up by and dependent on the far-righties of Voxâfrom coming to power. The argument in super-basic form: You may not like us, but they are very bad.
It all came back to this touchstone: almost any deal was justifiable in the name of stopping the far right, which is motivated by a distrust of democracy and a dislike of working people.
âLet's not be naive,â SĂĄnchez said. âThe PP's problem alongside Vox is not the amnesty, it is that they do not accept the result of the polls. We know that the amnesty matters very little to them. The economic powers that support them know that the amnesty will be good. What the rights do not want is for us to continue improving working conditions, that is why they do not want us to govern.â
SĂĄnchez be blunt: âIt is necessary that we continue governing to prevent Spain from retreating in the face of the reactionary wave that is advancing in all countries.â
Beyond that, there was lip service to how amnesty would ease tensions and calm the waters and blah blah blah. âWe must bet on coexistence [and approve the amnesty] to consolidate the progress made in these last four years,â SĂĄnchez said.Â
Following SĂĄnchezâs epic doubling down, it was in-ev-it-a-ble that the level of hostile repartee would soar, and it did. Welcome to Insulting Zingerfest 2023!
First came Feijoo, who, just like SĂĄnchez before him, trotted out election lines past and future.Â
FeijĂłoâs were aimed at firing up his electorate at SĂĄnchezâs, um, useful flip-flops on policy and principles when it came to amnesty (he was absolutely against before 23J, and totally for it when he needed Junts votes after). It has, indeed, become a parlor game to list all the times SĂĄnchez and his helpers said they wouldnât do what theyâve now agreed to do.
âThis investiture was born of a fraud," FeijĂło said. âThe deal brought to Parliament today was not voted on at the polls⊠Why don't they let Spaniards vote at the polls?"Â
SĂĄnchez âdoes not have anyone's support, he has bought it by paying checks that we will all pay,â he added
These are worthwhile points, and some are arguably true. But while having good points and being right will get you a win at debate society, here, in Spainâs hardscrabble political world, you lose. You need to cobble together more MP votes than the other guy, and FeijĂło didnât.
While FeijĂło was visibly frustrated with SĂĄnchez, it was no comparison to the speech that Vox leader Santiago Abascal offered when it was his turn. In short, he was livid.
The far-right leader pulled no punches and accused SĂĄnchez of âtrying to stage a coupâ and compared him to âChĂĄvez, Maduro and Hitlerâ arguing that they all used their position in power to âbreak democracyâ.
His words were interrupted by Parliament president Francina Armengol, who accused him of going against parliamentary decorum rules and against the âfoundations of democracyâ, warning him to withdraw his accusations. âThis country knows what a coup is,â she saidâpointing out to the bullet holes that can still be seen on the Parliament ceiling and referring to the failed coup of 1981.
Abascal refused to take back his words, and Armengol told him the language would be erased from the sessionâs minutes, to which he responded that such censorship was evidence it was indeed, a coup.
The far-right leader then warned PP leader FeijĂło that if his party didnât oppose the amnesty law in the Senate (where they have a majority) Vox would break up with the center-right and end their coalition governments in several of Spainâs autonomous communities (drama!).
After his speech, and before Pedro SĂĄnchez was able to offer a response, all of Voxâs 33 MPs left the floor in sign of protest (Abascal included).
Later that evening, it was Isabel DĂaz Ayusoâs turn to be involved in controversy after she was caught on camera calling SĂĄnchez a âson of a bitchâ.
Sanchez mentioned the corruption accusations made against her brother a couple of years ago (a court decided there was no evidence of wrongdoing in 2022). When the camera suddenly cut to her, she could be clearly seen saying âhijo de puta,â whichâyou guessed itâmeans the male child of a female dog.
When the media ran to ask her staffers about it, they replied she was just saying âme gusta la frutaâ (âI like fruitâ) which is a pretty random comment to make. But then someone from her team admitted she had actually insulted SĂĄnchez because he had made an accusation without evidence. âItâs the least he deserves,â they said.
Late in the evening (when everyone was kind of done for the day) it was time for Catalan separatist parties ERC and Junts to speak. And it was awkward as hell, especially for SĂĄnchez.
Neither of them minced words and clearly said this was simply a marriage of convenience. Neither party likes PSOE (or the Spanish government in general) and they both know that without their votes, SĂĄnchez canât be prime minister. So they decided to have some fun.
Gabriel RufiĂĄn from ERC (who loves to troll people in Parliament) warned SĂĄnchez that his party âtoday has the power to make him do thingsâ and yes, he even mentioned an independence referendum. âLook around,â he told him. âDo you see any alternative to us?â
âDonât risk it,â he concluded while SĂĄnchez just⊠sat there.
Then came Miriam Nogueras from Junts, who had a similar message for him and warned that they could withdraw their support âat any timeâ. âDonât test your luck,â she warned. Once again, SĂĄnchez just⊠sat there.
SĂĄnchez was relatively brief and avoided direct confrontation when responding to both of them, saying that he had been âbetting on having a dialogueâ since he took office in 2018.
Oh, and one last thing: yes, once again there were violent protests outside the PSOE headquarters last night. Some 2,000 people gathered outside the building and some of the most extreme elements present began hurling beer bottles and other objects to the police. The night ended with at least 14 people arrested and nine injured.
đ A Message From Our Sponsor

Bucólico Café is a project of connection that was born as a specialty coffee shop.
We value time and understand that it represents both a cycle and an instantâchronology and nostalgia. BucĂłlico is a space that connects oneâs soul with the purity, lightness and beauty of the countrysideâwhile being in the city. Via a cup of coffee, a piece of cake or a songâŠ
Located on Calle de Barbieri 4 â a few blocks from Plaza Chueca â BucĂłlico reassures the soul with a feeling of home.
Follow Bucólico Café on Instagram.
đŹ Five things to discuss at dinner parties this week
1. đȘđž Whatâs up with the hole in the flag?

The anti-amnesty protests over the last weeks have sported tons of flags. From ones with bulls, to ones spray-painted with slogans, to the âpre-democraticâ Franco-era variety toâŠthose with a big hole in the center where the coat of arms would normally be. What gives with the last one?
Hungary 1956? Itâs true! It has everything to do with Hungary 1956.
Anti-Soviet. Back in 1956, Hungarians rebelled against their countryâs domination by their Soviet overlords. They were, well, put down. Some 2,500 were killed (and 700 Soviet soldiers died) and 200,000 Hungarians fled abroad.Â
What does this have to do with Spain and amnesty and stuff? Since Hungaryâs 1956 put-down, cutting the coat of arms/state seal has become a symbol of a revolution of the people against their government.Â
âHole-yâ flags were flown in Romania when the people protested again Nicolae CeauĆescuâs dictatorship (the CeauÈescus were later executed after they, um, lost the revolution).
East German protesters did the same in 1989 as they protested for reunification (which they got).
The whole point is to remove the symbol of government (the seal) and leave the symbol of the peopleâthe colorsâto propose the people against the government.Â
Spanish protestors against SĂĄnchezâs amnesty deal are basically playing it like that. The difference between the Spanish protests and those in Hungary, Romania and East Germany? Well, Spain isnât literally a communist dictatorship.
But the point the protestors are trying to make is that they think Spain is going that way.Â
Happy times!
2. đ€ Whyâs that guy in Madrid?


